Model the economics that would lead a large implementation partner to build what you built, then manage the relationship with visible consequence and demonstrated arithmetic rather than with goodwill and a clause.
Maintained in the open at github.com/Golden-Section-Tx/playbook · CC BY-SA 4.0
A vendor was told they had won a large account. They had gone through every hoop with their implementation partner leading the process. Then it evaporated, and nobody at the partner would explain why. Some months later a senior partner at that same firm, which had already committed in writing not to build a competing product, floated the idea that perhaps they should pay a royalty to copy the system.
That is economics rather than character. Large consultancies run their build practices offshore. For a partner sitting on a major account, standing up something shaped like your product is a multi-million-dollar engagement he has to consciously walk past. Goodwill can't carry that relationship. And no clause in a partner agreement survives it either.
What does survive it is arithmetic the partner can see, plus a consequence he has already watched you impose.
The goal: A written partner economics model, reviewed quarterly, that says what the partner earns by reselling you and what he earns by replacing you.
The partner is not one actor. Three groups inside the firm want different things, and you are managing all three at once.
A deal I was told I had won died and the partner will not explain why. You have your answer. Act on it.
The partner has asked to renegotiate into a royalty. He has already priced the alternative. Take the conversation seriously and take the warning seriously.
I only have one partner and cannot afford to lose them. Then you do not have a partner strategy, you have a dependency. Run Channel Partnerships first and come back to this play when there is a second name.
A vendor was told they had won a large account. They had gone through every hoop with their implementation partner leading the process. Then it evaporated, and nobody at the partner would explain why.
Model the economics that would lead a large implementation partner to build what you built, then manage the relationship with visible consequence and demonstrated arithmetic rather than with goodwill and a clause.
A vendor was told they had won a large account. They had gone through every hoop with their implementation partner leading the process. Then it evaporated, and nobody at the partner would explain why.