Record every sales call with consent, score a weekly sample against five gating questions, track touches per closed deal by rep, and keep a library of the opening minutes and questions that moved deals, so you can tell a rep problem from a comp problem or a message problem before you change anything.
Maintained in the open at github.com/Golden-Section-Tx/playbook · CC BY-SA 4.0
Founders fix sales performance with the lever they can reach. They change the comp plan, rewrite the deck or replace a rep, and they do it without listening to a single call. The comp plan is usually not the problem. We have seen a team of four reps in which one carried the number, and the owner called it an incentive problem. It was a one-rep problem, and the data was in the call recordings and the activity log the whole time.
The evidence for what makes deals move already exists. It is in your calls. The best rep on a team often needs a fraction of the touches per closed deal that the weakest needs, and the difference shows up in the first sixty seconds, the questions asked and the point at which the rep finds out who decides. If nobody listens, none of that spreads.
The goal: A weekly review, run by a named owner, that scores a sample of calls against five gating questions, reports touches per closed deal by rep, and adds the best examples to a library new reps train from.
Five gating questions are enough to start. Adapt the wording to your product, and keep it to five.
Touches per closed deal is the count of calls, emails and meetings logged between first contact and signature, by rep. Compare reps against each other on the same segment. A wide gap means the problem is in how the work is being done, not in how the work is paid.
My reps will think I am spying on them. They will, for about a month. Start with your own calls and with the best calls. Make the point of the review plain: you are looking for what works so you can copy it.
An AI tool will do this for me. A tool can score every call against your questions, and that is a useful first pass. It cannot tell you what a prospect meant, and it can reward a rep for saying the right words. Keep a person in the loop.
We only close a few deals a quarter. Then review every call, and review lost deals as carefully as won ones. A small sample taken from only the wins teaches the wrong lesson.
My best rep refuses to share. Pay for the sharing, and make the library part of how the rep is evaluated. If a top rep still will not, you have learned something about the culture you are paying for.
Record every sales call with consent, score a weekly sample against five gating questions, track touches per closed deal by rep, and keep a library of the opening minutes and questions that moved deals, so you can tell a rep problem from a comp problem or a message problem before you change anything.
Founders fix sales performance with the lever they can reach. They change the comp plan, rewrite the deck or replace a rep, and they do it without listening to a single call. The comp plan is usually not the problem.
Founders fix sales performance with the lever they can reach. They change the comp plan, rewrite the deck or replace a rep, and they do it without listening to a single call. The comp plan is usually not the problem.
Run a 45-minute review each week with the sales lead and the founder, and the reps on a rotation. Play ninety seconds of the opening of a strong call and ninety seconds of a weak one. Discuss what the rep did, not who the rep is.
Choose the weekly sample. Per rep, one call that won, one that lost or stalled, and one first call, at least. Add every call over a size threshold you set.
My reps will think I am spying on them. They will, for about a month. Start with your own calls and with the best calls.